Really like this! Plot, characters, monsters - all well done.
Definitely disappointed in the sound quality. Not sure if it was just my theater or if it was across the boards.
When we saw Jurassic Park, the sound reverberated throughout the theater. The T-Rex coming closer, his footsteps were felt in the pit of my stomach, and when he roared, it was deafening.
This movie sounded like my TV without the stereo sound on.
Has anyone seen one of these âHigh Frame Rateâ 3D films theatrically?
None of my theaters have ever shown them, until now, when we have the âHigh Frame Rateâ version of Gemini Man.
Iâm torn because the 3D films that I have seen have had issues with motion looking stuttery, and I would like to see if this fixes itâŚwhy couldnât James Cameron have done this for Alita?
^Saw it in âHigh Frame Rateâ, which is apparently 60 FPS. Didnât know that other theaters had it at the full 120 FPS.
The movie itself was okay-ish, a B-movie version of Bourne; it was interesting to see after just finishing the Ad Astra anime series.
But the takeaway is that High Frame Rate solves most all the issues with 3D. Lateral motion did not have the âflipbook effectâ, better clarity, and almost no eye fatigue. Normally one of my movie pals has to take the glasses off for a bit during the film due to the eyestrain but with this he forgot he even had the glasses on.
As a side benefit, the CG for Will Smithâs clone was improved too.
If 3D films had all used this tech, I suspect 3D would be far more popular.
This one mightâve been better than the first, itâs not perfect but I had fun with it. While I keep hearing that Joker is a âright wing filmâ, ZL2 seems to better fit that title, it reminded me a bit of Kingsman: The Secret Service in that sense.
BTW, what is with the Woody Harrelson career revival lately? Heâs playing characters that are the opposite of the role on Cheers that made him famous.